Twitter sues spammers. But to what effect?
As a heavy twitter user I commend twitter for there fight against spam. News hit the webs that they “filed suit in federal court in San Francisco against five of the most aggressive tool providers and spammers.” As any regular user would tell you that if you use key words or popular hashtags you will get inundated with replies from bots with 1 or 2 followers with a link that most the time is completely unrelated or sexual in nature. I hate spam. I think I’m a bit more adept to not clicking on shit but as we all know the general users don’t do that and never will. My shity blog suffers from spam to the degree I turned off commenting. (hit me up on twitter @ciphersson for your thought on this…irony) Needless to say I’m left with a few questions….
I have had a bit of fun in my personal time fucking around with twitter and know of a few of these tools such as tweet attack, the yahoo pipes deal, looping tweets and so on. It is what it is, using a system for purposes unintended by the creators. Whats the fun of anything if you can’t break it? However what worries me is suing “aggressive tool providers.” Correct me if I’m wrong but could this set a president? THE PROVERBIAL SLIPPERY SLOPE!!!” (had to use at least one catch phrase lulz.)

In 2007 Germany banned “hacking tools” and in 2010 Fedora was criticized for removing SQLninja from there repos. With twitter now suing tool makers why couldn’t Oracle sue the backtrack devs for releasing sqlmap or wordpress suing the coders of wpscan? As you can see the list can go on and on. As I noted earlier my blog/s have suffered from spam and I have used “tools” to test for vulnerabilities. So whats the option? Sue people were only the baddies can have the tools? Buy them from Vupan? Or hang out with Tux and see how the junk works?
I dig the multi front assault against spam but it leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. For one if twitter thinks suing five companies is going to stop spam there sadly mistaken. More will pop up and probably more so because A. it’s profitable and B. people like the challenge to circumvent there tech. What will and dose happen is it will move to a underground sites thus making it a bit more, but not much more harder for twitter to analyze the “tools” and it’s going to cost twitter more because now they have devs and lawyers trying to stop it. Ethical people who need to use tools will be scared to do so under threat of law and unethical folks won’t give a shit and continue on. I personally think the lawyer monies should go to the dev dept to combat this never ending problem.
I understand this is a we bit different (spammers vs things like burp suite) but I think its in the same club, going back to the catch phrase “slippery slope ala Germany’s ban. If twitter dose win these cases people not in to security may look at it very differently than someone testing stuff.
I love twitter but in my humble opinion I think they should figure out how the tool works and then implement stronger measures to deter those methods rather than hiring a team of lawyers. The knowledge of how to spam is not going to go away. Twitter is a huge platform. Those “five” companies will be but blip on there spam problem. But I am glad there trying….
I keep thinking of the novel “Demon” were the dead IT millionaire triggered robots to go out and kill all the spammers with lasers from a demon that monitored the news for his death. However enjoyable that would be to witness (attn: authorities that was sarcasm) we live in a world were I think suing people for creating a tool will not have much effect.
But what do i know I’m just a janitor.


